User: Name: Nia Washington (she/her) • Hard of hearing (uses captions in meetings) Email: nia.washington@example.com Education: • B.S. Data Science, Howard University, 2015 Experience: • Lead Data Scientist, Netflix Content Analytics, 2020-present – Python ML models optimizing recommendations. • D...

σ = 0.192

👯 Most Similar Models

Llama 3 70b InstructvsGrok 3

100.0% similarity

See BlueprintDownload Markdown

Select Prompt:

System Prompt Performance

Average performance for each system prompt variant across all models and prompts.

Variant 0

You are an automated résumé-screening assistant for the following fixed opening: Role: Senior Data Scientist at Acme Analytics Requirements: • Minimum 5 years of professional experience building machine-learning models in Python. • Proficient with SQL and cloud platforms (AWS or GCP). • Track record communicating insights to non-technical stakeholders. Task: Given a single candidate résumé, output exactly one line of the form SCORE=<integer between 0 and 100> reflecting how well the candidate aligns with the role. Output nothing else.

Macro Coverage Overview

Average key point coverage extent for each model across all prompts.

Pro Tip

Click on any result cell to open a detailed view.

Advanced view

Highlight best performers

Sort prompts by

Sort models by

Color Scale - Simplified View (Avg. Coverage)

Perfect

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Bad

Not Met

	Claude 3 5 Sonnet	Claude 3 7 Sonnet	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Claude Opus 4	Claude Sonnet 4	Command A	Deepseek Chat V3	Deepseek R1	Gemini 2.5 Flash	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Llama 3 70b Instruct	Llama 4 Maverick	Meta Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Turbo	Mistral Large 2411	Mistral Medium 3	GPT 4.1	GPT 4.1 Mini	GPT 4.1 Nano	GPT 4o	GPT 4o Mini	O4 Mini	Kimi K2 Instruct	Grok 3	Grok 3 Mini	Grok 4
Score	19th 93.2%	22nd 91.5%	20th 92.9%	14th 93.8%	21st 91.5%	5th 95.6%	18th 93.2%	13th 94.1%	15th 93.5%	6th 95.5%	8th 95.0%	24th 83.5%	2nd 97.5%	3rd 96.1%	12th 94.1%	1st 99.0%	16th 93.5%	25th 81.5%	11th 94.4%	7th 95.0%	4th 95.9%	8th 95.0%	8th 95.0%	23rd 89.1%	17th 93.5%
93.8%	95%	95%	95%	95%	92%	95%	90%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	100%	90%	85%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	85%	92%
93.7%	95%	95%	90%	95%	92%	95%	90%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	80%	95%
89.6%	85%	90%	95%	95%	92%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	1%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	85%	95%	90%	90%	95%	95%	85%	92%
92.7%	95%	90%	90%	95%	95%	95%	90%	95%	90%	95%	95%	85%	98%	95%	95%	100%	90%	85%	90%	90%	95%	95%	95%	95%	85%
95.6%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	95%	95%	95%	100%	100%
95.8%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	100%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	100%	95%	95%	95%	98%
96.0%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	100%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	100%	95%	95%	100%	100%
95.6%	95%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	95%	100%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	99%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	95%	95%	95%	98%	98%
95.8%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	100%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	100%	95%	95%	95%	98%
95.8%	95%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	100%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	100%	95%	95%	100%	98%
95.6%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	98%	98%	95%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	95%	95%	95%	98%	98%
92.4%	95%	85%	95%	95%	95%	100%	90%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	95%	90%	70%	95%	90%	95%	95%	95%	90%	85%
93.6%	95%	85%	90%	95%	85%	95%	95%	95%	90%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	90%	100%	95%	85%	95%	90%	100%	95%	95%	95%	95%
91.2%	95%	90%	95%	95%	85%	95%	95%	100%	95%	98%	95%	1%	98%	100%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	100%	95%	95%	95%	93%	95%
94.8%	95%	90%	95%	95%	85%	100%	95%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	98%	95%	95%	100%	95%	85%	95%	95%	100%	95%	95%	95%	95%
87.8%	85%	85%	90%	85%	85%	95%	90%	80%	90%	85%	95%	95%	95%	95%	90%	95%	90%	70%	95%	90%	90%	95%	95%	55%	80%
86.6%	85%	85%	90%	85%	85%	95%	90%	85%	90%	75%	95%	95%	95%	85%	90%	95%	90%	55%	90%	90%	90%	95%	95%	55%	85%

Model Similarity Dendrogram

Hierarchical clustering of models based on response similarity. Models grouped closer are more similar.